Friday, September 26, 2008

Who's line Vid

Monday, September 22, 2008


By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
September 22, 2008

[Note: At the recent Democratic Convention, Bill Clinton said people incorrectly were warned in 1992 not to vote for him because of his inexperience in foreign affairs, as though Barack Obama would be just as “successful” though inexperienced. Well, look at the Clinton “successes” like allowing Al Qaeda to bomb the World Trade Center in 1993; the “success” in Somalia; and the terrorists bombings of the U.S. barracks in Khobar, (Saudi Arabia), the two embassies in Africa, and the U.S.S. Cole; etc. Trying to enlist support for his own campaign, Obama said, “The American people aren’t stupid…”, but didn’t the American people elect Congress which is held in even lower esteem than the president? Hillary Clinton asked all her supporters to come to the convention to be recognized for their effort, but then she cut a deal with Obama that didn’t allow any of her delegates after the State of New York (e.g., North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Oregon, Texas, Virginia, Washington, etc.) to vote for her! Democrat women don’t like being “dissed” by their own Party or Hillary, so this could be used by Gov. Sarah Palin (John McCain’s running mate) in an appeal for women’s votes. If McCain wins and serves only one term, or if he resigns after only three and a half years, Palin could be the first woman president. Although she’s prolife, pro-Second Amendment rights, and has more executive experience than Obama and Biden combined, she like McCain refers to serving “the common good.” This is a Communitarian view like that of the current President Bush and church growth leader Rick Warren, both agents of the power elite. Also, regarding Palin’s unmarried pregnant teenage daughter, did Palin teach her daughter that the HOLY BIBLE (1 Corinthians 6:9) clearly states that fornicators will go to Hell?

This is something all parents should teach their children. And Palin’s answer to her daughter’s pregnancy is that she’s going to marry the baby’s father. But would you want your daughter to vow before God to be married until death to a boy who on his own MY SPACE page says “I’m a f---ing redneck” and “I don’t want kids”? Referring to Sarah Palin’s executive experience being a governor compared favorably to Barack Obama being only a community organizer, top Democrat strategist Donna Brazille (who directed Al Gore’s 2000 campaign) and others recently retorted Jesus was a “community organizer” and Pontius Pilate was a governor. Now if Democrats wanted to create a favorable image of a community organizer compared to an unfavorable image of a governor, they could have done that without referring to a specific governor who had a specific “community organizer” (the Messiah) violently killed. However, they chose this specific comparison, and all Americans should ask themselves why any Democrats would do that!]

The movie BROTHERHOOD OF THE ROSE described how intelligence agencies, not national governments, actually worked together to control the world. In reality, the power elite (PE), not national governments, control the world using threats to coerce compliance with their will. Most people view world events in terms of the U.S. or NATO versus Russia or some other adversarial combination. However, the PE operates internationally above any nation and is comprised of individuals from the U.S., Europe, Russia, China, etc. who have no national loyalties, but rather are committed to their own power and control. At any given time, they may employ the military of any country to create a “threatening” situation in order to coerce compliance with their objectives. An economic threat may also be used, as Israel is militarily threatened by Iran, and the E.U. (represented by Javier Solana) probably threatened Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert with fewer investments and loans if Israel didn’t stop its final retaliation against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Similarly, the U.S. doesn’t have a free hand against Communist China because the Chinese own a lot of our debt. The U.S. also can’t simply withdraw from the global economy (which was created by the PE) because that would be disastrous economically (the stock market and people’s 401Ks would crash because of heavy investments overseas). Sucking China into the global economy is likewise a goal of the PE, because once the Chinese economy is integrated with others, they can be threatened with instability as well if they fail to comply with the PE’s wishes.

The threat against the West in general has been from Communism, as Lincoln Bloomfield’s report to Secretary of State Dean Rusk (Rhodes Scholar) indicated that the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government (which is the PE’s ultimate goal) if the Communist dynamic were greatly abated. But globally, threats can be non-Communist as well, as India feels threatened by Pakistan and vice versa (watch Kashmir in the future).

Oil is a major component of the PE’s threat mechanism. Oil-rich countries like Venezuela have felt militarily threatened by Colombian incursion, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia militarily were threatened by Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, and Libya has been bombed by the U.S.

Historically, Iran’s democratically elected leader was overthrown by revolution in the early 1950s because he nationalized the nation’s oil supply. The PE instigated the revolution which put into power the puppet Shah of Iran with the blessing of Ayatollah Kashani. When the Shah was no longer useful, a revolution instituted by the PE replaced him with Ayatollah Khomeini (mentored by Kashani). Today regarding its oil and gas, Iran seeks military and economic allies in Russia and China because it feels threatened by the U.S. and Israel.


Concerning Afghanistan, PE agent Zbigniew Brzezinski lured the Soviets there in the late 1970s as part of a PE plan regarding Caspian oil and gas. American forces conducted maneuvers in Kazakhstan in 1995, two years before Brzezinski’s THE GRAND CHESSBOARD (1997) was published describing the new “Great Game” for energy supplies in that region. The Soviet puppet in Afghanistan was replaced by the Taliban, and Al Qaeda was originally supported by the U.S. The Taliban balked at complying with the PE’s wishes regarding a pipeline from the Caspian region, thus resulting in a threat by the U.S. to which the Taliban’s ally, Al Qaeda, responded on 9/11/2001. The attack by Al Qaeda also served as part of an unending terrorist threat that prompted the American people to give up some of their liberties (another PE goal) in the Patriot and Homeland Security Acts. The attack also presented the “truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat” that Brzezinski said in his book was necessary “to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues,” such as attacking Afghanistan to achieve the PE’s oil and gas pipelines from the Caspian region. This was achieved by installing a compliant puppet, Karzai, as head of the new Afghan government.

In Yugoslavia, the situation was similar, as Slobodan Milosevic was standing in the way of a trade route linking the European Union with the planned Mediterranean Union (including Arab nations and Israel). He was also standing in the way of a new pipeline planned from Baku (Azerbaijan) on the Caspian Sea, then across the Black Sea through Kosovo down through Albania to the Adriatic Sea where it could be shipped to the West and around the world. Thus, the PE’s “spontaneous” revolution for independence in Kosovo, to which Milosovic reacted when CIA-trained Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) members (also supported by Al Qaeda) assassinated Serbian police, mayors, etc. This gave NATO (headed militarily by Rhodes Scholar Gen. Wesley Clark and politically by Javier Solana, a product of Rhodes Scholars Bill Clinton, Strobe Talbott, and Richard Gardner the “humanitarian crisis’ it needed to attack Milosevic, killing a lot of innocent civilians as well.

Another pipeline from Baku (Azerbaijan) through Georgia and then Turkey to the Mediterranean Sea also resulted in another “spontaneous” revolution for independence by South Ossetia within Georgia. This time, the “spontaneous” revolutionaries were allied with Russia. This gave the U.S.-funded and trained Georgians the threat they needed to react militarily, killing about 2000 South Ossetian civilians and sending another 40,000 refugees into Russia. This, in turn, gave the Russians the threat they needed to crush the Georgians militarily. In June 2008, long before military action, PE agent Brzezinski warned of “cases of possible threats by Russia, directed at Georgia with the intention of taking control over the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline.” PE agent Vladimir Putin could count on NATO’s non-response because he could easily once again cut off Germany’s, Poland’s, etc. natural gas pipeline from Russia.

The PE doesn’t want any nation or group of nations to be too strong or independent. This is why during and after WWII, the Soviets were given nuclear weapons material by FDR advisor Harry Hopkins, and Communist Chinese were brought to power by Gen. George Marshall, both nations then serving as threats to the U.S. This is why an independent Iran in the early 1950s had to be undermined. It’s why the U.S. had to not win in Korea and lose in Vietnam, and why the Soviets had to lose in Afghanistan. It’s why the U.S. had to be threatened by terrorists, why Saddam Hussein had to be ousted when he didn’t succumb to the will of “the international community,” and why Slobodan Milosevic had to be removed from power for the same reason (the examples of Hussein and Milosevic serve to coerce other potentially independent leaders into compliance with the PE’s will). And it’s why NATO’s expansion eastward toward Georgia was resisted by Russia, resulting in the current (and probably lasting) stalemate there.

In case you doubt the goal is a stalemate in Georgia, read carefully what PE agent Brzezinski wrote in his THE GRAND CHESSBOARD relevant to Caspian oil, gas and minerals. After referring several times to “ruling national elites,” he explained “that America’s primary interest is to help ensure that no single power comes to control this geopolitical space (Eurasia) and that the global community has unhindered financial and economic access to it.” Now one would think that Brzezinski as a former American national security advisor (and current Obama advisor) would like it if the U.S. (a “single power”) controlled this geopolitical space, but that’s not what he said. Rather, he emphasized “no single power” should control it. Remember that Brzezinski was David Rockefeller’s first director of the Trilateral Commission, and Rockefeller in his MEMOIRS (2002) acknowledged about himself that he is “part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States… conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world.”

As long as no nation or group of nations becomes too strong or independent, the PE will maintain its power and control. Military and economic (cutoff of energy supplies) threats keep nations compliant with the will of the PE, which seeks to control the activities of nations and move them inexorably into regional economic unions to be linked ultimately into a World Socialist Government under the PE’s control. In order that Americans accept this World Socialist Government, the PE increasingly has to move the U.S. toward Socialism. This is being done via economic crises such as the recent federal takeover of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and American International Group (AIG). Government takeover of such major financial institutions is definitely a move toward classical economic Socialism. Nouriel Roubini, professor of Economics and International Business at New York University, has suggested we may enter a global recession, and banks may have to be nationalized – another step toward Socialism and fulfillment of the PE’s plan. Also, the announcement on September 19, 2008 that the federal government is going to bailout Wall Street means that the taxpayer will pick up the tab for all that debt. This will mean inflation (an indirect form of taxation) and a devaluing of the dollar (another part of the PE’s plan to institute regional currencies like the Amero).

As I’ve written before, the PE has not only economic and political goals, but religious as well. They have a “theology of power,” and facilitating this is “The Family,” a somewhat secretive organization which began in the 1930s with definite Fascist leanings. Over the decades, they have characterized even some brutal dictators as “men of God.” The dictators respond favorably because The Family emphasizes to them (and everyone else) Romans 13:1 which states: “…For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.” In the U.S., although invitations to the annual National Prayer Breakfast appear to come from the White House, it is actually organized (since 1953) by The Family and often has non-Christian speakers. Over the decades, powerful Republicans and Democrats have been associated with The Family. And Jeff Sharlet, author of THE FAMILY (2008), claims Hillary Clinton is considered a “friend” of this organization, which has formed a network of powerful leaders around the world. The PE’s goal is global, economic, political and religious power and control, which they use toward achieving a World Socialist Government and a One-World Religion.

© 2008 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved


Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.

Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.

Friday, September 19, 2008

Food for thought

Grilled Halibut with Cilantro Garlic Butter

Grilled Halibut with Cilantro Garlic Butter


4 (6 ounce) fillets halibut
1 lime, cut into wedges
salt and pepper to taste
3 cloves garlic, coarsely chopped
1/2 cup chopped fresh cilantro
1 tablespoon fresh lime juice
2 tablespoons butter
1 tablespoon olive oil

Preheat a grill for high heat. Squeeze the juice from the lime wedges over fish fillets, then season them with salt and pepper.
Grill fish fillets for about 5 minutes on each side, until browned and fish can be flaked with a fork. Remove to a warm serving plate.
Heat the oil in a skillet over medium heat. Add the garlic; cook and stir just until fragrant, about 2 minutes. Stir in the butter, remaining lime juice and cilantro. Serve fish with the cilantro butter sauce.

Friday, September 12, 2008

Salad Nicoise

Salad Nicoise

2 servings
This is an elegant but simple whole meal salad. The addition of greens is our own touch. This is a "composed" salad – one in which the components are arranged artfully on the plate. If you don't want to take the time, it tastes just as good if all the ingredients are tossed together.

Prep time: 15 minutes

1 tbsp quality extra-virgin olive oil
2 tbsp balsamic vinegar
1 clove garlic, minced
4 cups looseleaf lettuce, torn into pieces
1 cup string beans, steamed until just tender
1 ripe red tomato, cut into wedges
1 hard cooked egg, cut in 4 wedges
1 7-oz can albacore tuna, drained

Mix together the olive oil, vinegar and garlic in a small bowl. In a medium bowl, add half the dressing to the lettuce and toss to coat. Divide between two salad plates. Arrange the green beans, tomato, egg and tuna on the greens. Drizzle with the remaining dressing

Baked Pheasant Strips

Baked Pheasant Strips

Recipe By :Edie Franson
Serving Size : 0 Preparation Time :0:00
Categories :

Amount Measure Ingredient -- Preparation Method
-------- ------------ --------------------------------
4 pheasant breast halves -- skinned and boned
1 1/2 cups Italian bread crumbs
3 tablespoons Parmesan cheese -- grated
3/4 teaspoon garlic powder
1/2 cup vegetable oil

In a large plastic zip-top bag, combine bread crumbs, cheese, and
garlic powder. Pour oil into a small bowl. Place a breast between two
sheets of heavy plastic wrap. With a meat mallet, flatten breast meat
to 1/4 inch thick; cut into 1 inch wide strips. Do the same to
remainder of breasts. Dip strips in oil; place in bag with crumb
mixture and toss to coat. Remove; place on a greased baking sheet.
Bake at 350 degrees for 20 minutes or until golden brown. Serve with
Honey Dipping Sauce. (see recipe)

"365 Wild Game Recipes"
"2001 Edie Franson"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Per Serving (excluding unknown items): 1700 Calories; 118g Fat (62.3%
calories from fat); 32g Protein; 129g Carbohydrate; 8g Dietary Fiber;
14mg Cholesterol; 5050mg Sodium. Exchanges: 8 1/2 Grain(Starch); 1
Lean Meat; 23 Fat.

Dijon-Tarragon Cream Chicken


1 tablespoon butter
1 tablespoon olive oil
4 skinless, boneless chicken breast halves
salt and pepper to taste
1/2 cup heavy cream
1 tablespoon Dijon mustard
2 teaspoons chopped fresh tarragon

Melt the butter and heat the oil in a skillet over medium-high heat. Season chicken with salt and pepper, and place in the skillet. Brown on both sides. Reduce heat to medium, cover, and continue cooking 15 minutes, or until chicken juices run clear. Set aside and keep warm.
Stir cream into the pan, scraping up brown bits. Mix in mustard and tarragon. Cook and stir 5 minutes, or until thickened. Return chicken to skillet to coat with sauce. Drizzle chicken with remaining sauce to serve.

Wednesday, September 3, 2008


By Larry PrattAugust 29, 2008

A June 8 murder of two young people in rural Waleetka has provided the excuse for the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI) to behave as if the Bill of Rights is an impediment to be overcome in order to employ effective police procedures.
In their search for the killer, the OSBI sent a letter to some sixty owners of .40 caliber handguns (the same caliber as used by the murderer) in the community where the victims had lived. The letter "invited" the owners to bring the guns in for testing.
This letter raises disturbing questions.
The first question is -- what is the probable cause that would justify sending the letter to the selected handgun owners? If there were probable cause, why were no warrants obtained per the Fourth Amendment?
For the twenty or so owners who have not responded to the "invitation," will they be forced to testify against themselves (in violation of the Fifth Amendment) in some second phase of the investigation? If they do not comply with a warrantless "invitation," will the OSBI agents tell us that that now gives them probable cause? This sounds like a dragnet, not an investigation.
The second question is, where did the police get a registration list of Oklahoma gun owners? This violation of the Second Amendment should outrage every gun owner, indeed, every freedom-loving citizen of the state.
The third question is, why does OSBI think that a registered gun will lead them to the murderer? I will repeat now what I told the media during the Beltway Sniper murder spree in 2002. Cops will find the murderer's gun (if they ever find it) when they find the murderer.
How can cops in the gun-friendly state of Oklahoma be so clueless? A policewoman called in to a Philadelphia talk show I was doing years ago. She stated that in her 26 years on the force she had never arrested a criminal who had used a registered gun.
OSBI agents should be sent back to school. What they are doing to Oklahoma gun owners is not only constitutionally offensive, it is a waste of time. They have put themselves into the same ridiculous club whose membership includes Montgomery County, Maryland’s former police chief, Charles Moose.
Chief Moose led an investigation similar to that of the OSBI's. His officers got a registration list of Maryland suburban gun owners who had bought rifles that used the same caliber as the Muslims who were conducting their Beltway Sniper jihad. Moose was convinced that the murderer was a disgruntled white man (similar to one of the voters whom Obama complains bitterly that cling to their guns and Bibles) driving a white panel truck.
Well, I was right and Moose was wrong. When some truckers found the murderers, it turned out that they were two black converts to Islam who were asleep in their grey sedan. One of them was cradling the murder weapon.
Where did Chief Moose get his registration list? From the same place the OSBI got their registration list. Government agents can rummage through the names and addresses of gun owners in the name of fighting crime -- and they get this information from the records the federal government unconstitutionally requires firearms dealers to maintain.
Gun owners should be aware that historically, registration lists have never been used to solve crimes, but they have made dandy tools for disarming the subjects of a dictatorship. Think Cuba (under Fidel Castro), Uganda (under Idi Imin), Cambodia (under Pol Pot), China (under Mao Tse Dung), Germany (under Adolph Hitler) and Russia (under Vladimir Lenin).

Chief Moose and the OSBI have provided, and are providing, more proof (as if we needed it) that registration is not a crime fighting tool.
The 1968 Gun Control Act imposed the decentralized, but very real, national registration system that now records all gun owners who buy a gun from a dealer. That is why Gun Owners of America has always opposed the 1968 Gun Control Act and has asked Congress to dismantle this threat to freedom -- a scheme that is not even an effective crime-fighting tool.

Without an unconstitutional registration list at their disposal, OSBI would not have had this opportunity to trample on the Bill of Rights -- and embarrass themselves in public.
© 2008 Larry Pratt - All Rights Reserved

Sign Up For Free E-Mail AlertsE-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Larry Pratt has been Executive Director of Gun Owners of America for 27 years. GOA is a national membership organization of 300,000 Americans dedicated to promoting their second amendment freedom to keep and bear arms.
He published a book, Armed People Victorious, in 1990 and was editor of a book, Safeguarding Liberty: The Constitution & Militias, 1995. His latest book, On the Firing Line: Essays in the Defense of Liberty was published in 2001.
The GOA web site is: Pratt's weekly talk show Live Fire is archived there at:
Either Pratt or another GOA spokesman is available for press interviews.